Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


83% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Where's all the ICC love? »
- Error? »
- Where's all the pirate love? »
- new lasers »
- Class-limited garage spaces (And unlocking slots with credits) »
- 1.7 Layouts: Where we are »
- What's with the player MI? »
- Where's all the UGTO love? »
- Decommission platforms »
- Bug Report »

Development Blog

- Tools for tips »
- Ship Tiers and You »
- Cloaking update... »
- Under Construction »
- Game Mechanics Question and Answer Thread »
- Give Credits feature now live! »
- Stats, stats, stats! »
- Fleet levels and more! »
- The Silent Cartographer »
- Darkspace Wiki »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
Kills chart
Killboard

Upcoming Events

No Events

Search

 

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Facebook & Twitter

Why not follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » eccm vs cloak
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author eccm vs cloak
Gekko-Go
Fleet Admiral
*Renegade Space Marines*


Joined: August 08, 2010
Posts: 3
Posted: 2012-07-01 22:48   
i can understand why ugto can nolonger 'ping' cloaked luth, but i do have one issue.
i am sitting orbiting a planet that has a sensor base. i am sitting next to a sensor platform i have built, and my command dreadnaught has all three eccm running.

a luth transport then appears directly on top of my ship, drops infanty, and then flies (or jumps) away.

i have had this happen multiple times, and it is frustrating because the privateer badge is the hardest to get, yet this seems to give the luth an extreme advantage in obtaining it. i'm not even sure if there is a gap where pd can destroy the transports, a problem the other two factions have to accomidate.
[ This Message was edited by: Gekko-Go on 2012-07-08 20:06 ]
_________________


Pixies & Leprechauns
Fleet Admiral
Army Of Darkness


Joined: March 24, 2009
Posts: 268
Posted: 2012-07-02 04:03   
best way is not to orbit a planet while seeming afk. just fly around and shoot stuff.

If u orbit a planet and can watch a tranny jump in dictor, cloak, u wait till it uncloaks on top of u...well i dont know what to say. I can say its not the luth fault cappin is easy....
_________________
Im not drunk! i simply had to many beer

RogueAvenger
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 291
From: England
Posted: 2012-07-02 04:28   
also if your sat at a friendly planet why not load inf until it kills the ones dropped on you and yes trust me ECCM stack does affect cloak quite harshly often i have o slow to 7gu or below near a planet with a few ai/dreads so i dont drain energy to badly
_________________


  Email RogueAvenger
Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3500
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2012-07-02 05:16   
Quote:

On 2012-07-01 22:48, Gekko-Go wrote:
i can understand why ugto can nolonger 'ping' cloaked luth, but i do have one issue.
i am sitting orbiting a planet that has a sensor base. i am sitting next to a sensor platform i have built, and my command dreadnaught has all three eccm running.

a luth transport then appears directly on top of my ship, drops infanty, and then flies (or jumps) away.

i have had this happen multiple times, and it is frustrating because the privateer badge is the hardest to get, yet this seems to give the luth an extreme advantage in obtaining it. i'm not even sure if there is a gap where pd can destroy the transports, a problem the other two factions have to accomidate.



Different story if it were a dictored planet.


_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Ravendark
Marshal
Sanity Assassins

Joined: July 01, 2010
Posts: 382
Posted: 2012-07-02 10:06   
blasphemy!!
_________________


Fleet Admiral Maxwell House
Fleet Admiral

Joined: June 07, 2007
Posts: 85
From: Quebec
Posted: 2012-07-02 10:09   
He is not talking about being capped, he is saying that even with 1 sensor base, 1 sensor platform, and 3 ECCM, it didn't seem to affect the luth cloak at all.
_________________
Would you be quite gentle as to take this coffee cup in the face and get knocked uncounscious my dear friend.


Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1176
Posted: 2012-07-02 10:10   
ECCM and Sensor Bases only increase energy consumption for the Cloaking Device.
_________________


Fleet Admiral Maxwell House
Fleet Admiral

Joined: June 07, 2007
Posts: 85
From: Quebec
Posted: 2012-07-02 11:28   
I'd like to know how much every ECCM changes the energy consuption of the cloak, if its possible to have any numbers.
_________________
Would you be quite gentle as to take this coffee cup in the face and get knocked uncounscious my dear friend.


Pixies & Leprechauns
Fleet Admiral
Army Of Darkness


Joined: March 24, 2009
Posts: 268
Posted: 2012-07-02 12:17   
there has been extensive testing and reports when patch first came out, some thread somewhere
_________________
Im not drunk! i simply had to many beer

RogueAvenger
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 291
From: England
Posted: 2012-07-02 13:50   
Quote:

On 2012-07-02 10:10, Bardiche wrote:
ECCM and Sensor Bases only increase energy consumption for the Cloaking Device.




Yep and they do stack harshly but remeber that normal ecm only has a range of 400 gus so a luth is ONLY AFFECTED when they get close not on there approach mostly i run a slo 5-7 gu when i ghet within 400-500gy of a still target so i dont drain energy
_________________


  Email RogueAvenger
Fattierob
Vice Admiral
Gutsy Galaxy Guard


Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 3991
Posted: 2012-07-02 16:08   
Quote:

On 2012-07-02 11:28, Fleet Admiral Maxwell House wrote:
I'd like to know how much every ECCM changes the energy consuption of the cloak, if its possible to have any numbers.





Sure. First, let's understand how cloak works. Cloak works by taking the current signature of the ship and finding out whatever number would set that signature to zero. So if you have 10 signature, that number is (obviously) -10. So the calculations look like this:

Energy cost = Hull Modifier * (5 + (5 * level) + (.5 * signature))

This energy cost is multiplied by .75 if you are out of combat.

The hull modifiers and gadget levels are are

Scout: .78 ; 2
Frigate: 1.0 ; 3
Destroyer: 1.0 ; 4
Cruiser: 1.1 ; 5
Dread: 1.2 ; 6
Assault Dread: 1.3 ; 7
Station: 1.5 ; 10

So, let's do some math. I'm in a dreadnought that is not out of combat and I have a signature of 15. My calculations are

1.2 * ((5 + (5 * 6) + (.5 * 15)) = 51 thousandth energy used per tic

This means that every second I am using (20 * 51) / 1000 = 1.02 energy to sustain my cloak.

ECM/ECCM just subtracts/adds signature which in effect increases their energy drain
_________________
He survived through countless battles.
Not even once retreating; Not even once being understood.
He was always alone.
Intoxicated with victory in a hill of swords.

  Email Fattierob
RogueAvenger
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 291
From: England
Posted: 2012-07-02 16:23   
[quote]
On 2012-07-02 16:08, Fattierob wrote:
Quote:


ECM/ECCM just subtracts/adds signature which in effect increases their energy drain




Any news on a fix for when using a ECM on the ship your in while cloaked makes you visable :/
_________________


  Email RogueAvenger
Fattierob
Vice Admiral
Gutsy Galaxy Guard


Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 3991
Posted: 2012-07-02 16:48   
Quote:

On 2012-07-02 16:23, -RogueAvenger- wrote:

Any news on a fix for when using a ECM on the ship your in while cloaked makes you visable :/



I don't see this bug in mantis, so it probably wasn't reported. Send in a support ticket with as much details as you can to how to reproduce the bug and it'll get into the system and fixed eventually
_________________
He survived through countless battles.
Not even once retreating; Not even once being understood.
He was always alone.
Intoxicated with victory in a hill of swords.

  Email Fattierob
Fleet Admiral Maxwell House
Fleet Admiral

Joined: June 07, 2007
Posts: 85
From: Quebec
Posted: 2012-07-02 18:56   
Quote:

On 2012-07-02 16:08, Fattierob wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-07-02 11:28, Fleet Admiral Maxwell House wrote:
I'd like to know how much every ECCM changes the energy consuption of the cloak, if its possible to have any numbers.





Sure. First, let's understand how cloak works. Cloak works by taking the current signature of the ship and finding out whatever number would set that signature to zero. So if you have 10 signature, that number is (obviously) -10. So the calculations look like this:

Energy cost = Hull Modifier * (5 + (5 * level) + (.5 * signature))

This energy cost is multiplied by .75 if you are out of combat.

The hull modifiers and gadget levels are are

Scout: .78 ; 2
Frigate: 1.0 ; 3
Destroyer: 1.0 ; 4
Cruiser: 1.1 ; 5
Dread: 1.2 ; 6
Assault Dread: 1.3 ; 7
Station: 1.5 ; 10

So, let's do some math. I'm in a dreadnought that is not out of combat and I have a signature of 15. My calculations are

1.2 * ((5 + (5 * 6) + (.5 * 15)) = 51 thousandth energy used per tic

This means that every second I am using (20 * 51) / 1000 = 1.02 energy to sustain my cloak.

ECM/ECCM just subtracts/adds signature which in effect increases their energy drain




Hmm. Interesing And by how much does eveery ECCM adds sign? I wasn't able to find the information...
_________________
Would you be quite gentle as to take this coffee cup in the face and get knocked uncounscious my dear friend.


Brutality *TO*
Marshal
Faster than Light


Chatting in 'DarkSpace English'

Joined: May 25, 2009
Posts: 617
From: Alaska, USA
Posted: 2012-07-02 19:06   
Quote:

On 2012-07-02 18:56, Fleet Admiral Maxwell House wrote:

Hmm. Interesing And by how much does eveery ECCM adds sign? I wasn't able to find the information...




It depends how close you are to the ship with the eccm. The closer you get the higher the signal strength?
_________________


Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Page created in 0.037204 seconds.


Copyright ©2000-2013 by Palestar, All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR