Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


59% of target met.

Latest Topics

- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
Kills chart
UGTO (1) ICC (0) K'Luth (0)

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/16/24 +6.1 Days

Search

Anniversaries

14th - darkruler123
13th - Etheron

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » ICC Shields
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
 Author ICC Shields
BorgDrone4of20(KuYa)
Cadet

Joined: May 08, 2003
Posts: 31
From: Cube 69 Section 4 Alcove 20
Posted: 2005-07-18 22:45   
maybe it stems from the same promblem that allows eccm "pinging"

_________________


  Email BorgDrone4of20(KuYa)
JackSwift
Cadet
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: October 30, 2002
Posts: 1806
From: Where the Sun dont Shine (Seattle-ish)
Posted: 2005-07-18 22:53   
Also keep in mind that ICC planets having shields don't mean anything anymore since neutron and bio bombs go right through them.
_________________
(too lazy to rehost that old sig)



\"Errare Human Est.\"





  Email JackSwift
Lark of Serenity
Grand Admiral
Raven Warriors

Joined: June 02, 2002
Posts: 2516
Posted: 2005-07-18 22:53   
thatd be true, if any of ICC turned their shields on and off rapidly, which im gonna say now they probably dont. some people keep their shields off while bombing to conserve energy, but thats pretty much it.

and as for ICC being "offensive"

to my understanding, youre implying that we should have NO offensive specialisation of any kind? yes, thatd be lovely...

heres the deal, ICC bomb planets to dust, capture them, then defend those planets. thats how we work. people who accuse us of planet camping are dead on - ITS WHAT WERE GOOD AT =) the idea is that we can advance on a planet and take it easily, and defend it reasonably well. honestly, if you cant take back the planets we leave behind us you must not be that good, since most of the planets we capture wind up with no structures on them whatsoever... prime targets. if UGTO did it that way they wouldnt get newhere, wed be doing flyby tranny rushes all over =P
_________________
Admiral Larky, The Wolf
Don't play with fire, play with Larky.
Raven Division Command - 1st Division


Arcanum {C?}
Cadet

Joined: June 25, 2005
Posts: 222
Posted: 2005-07-18 23:19   
Quote:

On 2005-07-18 19:06, Tael wrote:
Assault Disruptors were just fixed, and should be in the next update.

As for the shields, Jack doesnt know what he is talking about because what he just said is completely wrong...




Tael...I like you. Truth is a rare commodity these days...

[ This Message was edited by: Bottombum (Esari) on 2005-07-18 23:20 ]
_________________
The Praetorian Wolves.



We are many. We are one.

-Viper-
Fleet Admiral

Joined: July 26, 2001
Posts: 55
From: UK
Posted: 2005-07-19 04:59   
Hmm their shields arn't that bad. But if they do buff them up a bit they will need to reduce the firepower otherwise they will have high def and offence. Against 10 kluth disriptors they will go down fast yea, but kluth is the high offence faction and thats the whole idea

[ This Message was edited by: -Viper- on 2005-07-19 05:01 ]
_________________


BipBipBip
Grand Admiral

Joined: September 01, 2004
Posts: 43
Posted: 2005-07-19 10:54   
All I know is that I have a VERY hard time killing ICC destroyers with my lvl 10 mandy...
I mean... it's even harder than killing Assault Cruisers or even Dreads...

3 alpha's and they still have shields on... I can't touch their hull...
Maybe it's just that I'm fighting against vets who know how to properly rotate their shields.
I find it a lot easier to kill Assault cruisers and Missile Dreads...

But if you say this is about right, ok... I can live with it as long as they can't kill me either...

_________________


MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1912
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2005-07-19 11:22   
Yeah ICC dreads you have to gang up on and deplete their shields fast. Otherwise it's a long fight and you'll come out the loser.
_________________


Maskerade
Grand Admiral
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 21, 2002
Posts: 638
From: Canada
Posted: 2005-07-19 12:01   
All I'll say is that it does seem harder to punch through the shields one the destroyers than on the Dreadnaughts. It seems that way.
_________________
- Maskerade

Zeritu
Grand Admiral
Pitch Black


Joined: December 02, 2002
Posts: 264
Posted: 2005-07-19 12:41   
Viper 10 Beams of any kind hitting your Shiels is going to affect your Shields.


[ This Message was edited by: Zeritu {Da Hui} Recruiting on 2005-07-19 12:59 ]
_________________


  Goto the website of Zeritu
-Viper-
Fleet Admiral

Joined: July 26, 2001
Posts: 55
From: UK
Posted: 2005-07-19 13:17   
10 pulse beams?
_________________


virtualsoldier
Cadet

Joined: July 05, 2005
Posts: 7
Posted: 2005-07-19 13:17   
just have too look at the current meta verse map atm too see whos getting ripped apart with this patch . the old map had a balanced formulation but atm icc are soo weakened that the cant hold there core system
_________________


Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
Page created in 0.028183 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR