Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/11/24 +6.0 Days

Search

Anniversaries

21th - Sir Oblivion {C?}

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Uggy command dread
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author Uggy command dread
Starfist
Chief Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 22, 2003
Posts: 574
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:23   
I think the 1 fighter bay on the UGTO Command Dread should be switched to a pcm missile as the 1 fighter is a joke and the ship is a bombing ship after all.
_________________


Barthezzz
Fleet Admiral

Joined: May 31, 2001
Posts: 5630
From: The Netherlands
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:26   
How is 1 PCM any less of a joke then a fighter?

Anyway, The Ship layouts are gonna be changed soon anyway
_________________


  Goto the website of Barthezzz
Gideon
Cadet

Joined: September 14, 2001
Posts: 4604
From: Oregon, USA
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:35   
Command class ships (Command Dread (UGTO), Command Carrier (ICC), Ganglia (K'Luth)) will become what are known as "hybrid" ships. These combine aspecs of carriers, bombers, and combat ships.

Note: They do NOT have any sort of build or supply bay.

The Command Carrier leans more towards the carrier part of the mix, and the Ganglia leans more towards the combat part of the equasion. Command Dreads (UGTO) are sort of balanced.

_________________


Semper ubi,
Sub ubi

[ This Message was edited by: Gideon on 2003-11-24 11:35 ]
_________________
...and lo, He looked upon His creation, and said, "Fo shizzle."

  Email Gideon
pika
Cadet

Joined: October 03, 2002
Posts: 106
From: New Brighton, MN
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:47   
while I think it's silly to have a bomber that can reload itself, the ICC command carrier has been extremely useful as a support ship in the gap between supply ships and stations... will there be anything to fill that gap?

_________________
All generalizations are false.

We are accepting new Initiates, check the fleet page for details.

[ This Message was edited by: pika on 2003-11-24 11:48 ]
_________________
All generalizations are false.
We are accepting new Initiates, check the fleet page for details.

  Email pika
Gideon
Cadet

Joined: September 14, 2001
Posts: 4604
From: Oregon, USA
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:53   
Supply ships supply.

Engineer ships build.

Stations do both.

Period.

_________________


Semper ubi,
Sub ubi

[ This Message was edited by: Gideon on 2003-11-24 11:53 ]
_________________
...and lo, He looked upon His creation, and said, "Fo shizzle."

  Email Gideon
Barthezzz
Fleet Admiral

Joined: May 31, 2001
Posts: 5630
From: The Netherlands
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:02   
We need Bigger supply ships that can actually fix 2 Ships at the same time.

Like A Sup with 2 Drone bays in each direction.
It would be able to function as a support platform thingie and Sup 4 ships at the same time...
_________________


  Goto the website of Barthezzz
Starfist
Chief Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 22, 2003
Posts: 574
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:04   
thx for clearing that up for me Gideon i always thought that 1 fighter was a waste of a slot on that ship

_________________


Sandals
Fleet Admiral
Agents

Joined: January 21, 2002
Posts: 2001
From: Redmond,WA,USA
Posted: 2003-11-24 13:25   
so the ICC carrier will be getting bombs and so will the Ganglia?
_________________


Russian Roulette with Muskets
Grand Admiral

Joined: September 04, 2002
Posts: 393
Posted: 2003-11-24 13:29   
so that means the ships cant do anything good?


_________________
- In firepower we trust. - I'm not buying this! -we ran out of firepower.

Axianda The Royal
Fleet Admiral
Terra Squadron

Joined: November 20, 2001
Posts: 4273
From: Axianda
Posted: 2003-11-24 13:33   
Quote:

On 2003-11-24 11:53, Gideon wrote:
Supply ships supply.

Engineer ships build.

Stations do both.

Period.



/me writes down these words of wisdom


You got to see the new layout of the command dread its wicked
_________________

- Axi

Smith
Fleet Admiral

Joined: October 13, 2002
Posts: 320
From: Pittsburgh
Posted: 2003-11-24 14:35   
Quote:

On 2003-11-24 11:47, pika wrote:
while I think it's silly to have a bomber that can reload itself






how is that silly its odviously meant to be a go out , stand alone stealth ship. ofcoarse it would have its own resupply, u think ur gonna bomb anything with 6 mirv's, roflmfao.
_________________
Note: This signature image was resized due to it exceeding the forum guidelines for size.


Gideon
Cadet

Joined: September 14, 2001
Posts: 4604
From: Oregon, USA
Posted: 2003-11-24 14:42   
Quote:

On 2003-11-24 14:35, Smith wrote:
Quote:

On 2003-11-24 11:47, pika wrote:
while I think it's silly to have a bomber that can reload itself






how is that silly its odviously meant to be a go out , stand alone stealth ship. ofcoarse it would have its own resupply, u think ur gonna bomb anything with 6 mirv's, roflmfao.




Ahhh, but here is the point behind the point...

A bombing ship resupplying itself is rather disruptive to the balance of the game. If a ship has insufficient bombs to do it's job, then perhaps the more prudent task would be to address the bomb component itself, no?

_________________


Semper ubi,
Sub ubi

[ This Message was edited by: Gideon on 2003-11-24 14:42 ]
_________________
...and lo, He looked upon His creation, and said, "Fo shizzle."

  Email Gideon
Smith
Fleet Admiral

Joined: October 13, 2002
Posts: 320
From: Pittsburgh
Posted: 2003-11-24 14:45   

[/quote]Ahhh, but here is the point behind the point...

A bombing ship resupplying itself is rather disruptive to the balance of the game. If a ship has insufficient bombs to do it's job, then perhaps the more prudent task would be to address the bomb component itself, no[/quote]



and that would be what?

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: Smith on 2003-11-24 14:47 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Smith on 2003-11-24 14:47 ]
_________________
Note: This signature image was resized due to it exceeding the forum guidelines for size.


-Ashiya-
Vice Admiral

Joined: October 21, 2003
Posts: 204
From: The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland.
Posted: 2003-11-24 19:16   
nothing new when unrestricted moddeling was possible many build the hv supply with mirvs or the commanddread with 7 pcms and reload/repair
_________________
Shii's Song


  Email -Ashiya-   Goto the website of -Ashiya-
Koda
Marshal
Fatal Squadron


Joined: August 29, 2002
Posts: 1384
Posted: 2003-11-24 21:10   
cool
_________________






Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Page created in 0.030237 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR