Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

Search

Anniversaries

21th - Sir Oblivion {C?}

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Worm Hole
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
 Author Worm Hole
Bobamelius
Grand Admiral
Galactic Navy


Joined: October 08, 2002
Posts: 2074
From: Ohio
Posted: 2004-03-06 11:56   
Command dread would be a good UGTO candidate to have a small wormhole generator...
_________________


  Email Bobamelius
AdmBito
Grand Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: October 04, 2002
Posts: 1249
From: Its hard out here for a pimp
Posted: 2004-03-06 13:40   
Quote:

On 2004-03-06 07:04, Josef wrote:
I say leave it in there. Diversity is good. I dont want to play a game where every side gets the same ships, just with different names. And besides, worm holes are pretty damn fun.
Quote:
On 2004-03-06 05:20, DOM700 [-IMO-] wrote:
I say remove the wormhole device as it is a disadvantage for ICC
It's hard to fly a ship with a jumpdrive which requires you to stop and takes ages to recharge
Schakal was hunted by a battle cruiser on his bombing run in BD and he couldnt escape


It's only a disadvantage to the Jump Cruiser. But then, you only pick the Jump Cruiser because you know it's got the Worm Hole. If you wanted to do a bombing run without risking your escape on a 5 minute wormhole recharge, you'd use the bomber dread.

You assume the risks by choosing the Jump Cruiser, its not an immutable burden placed on your faction as a whole.




Hear hear! Who wants only the same ships to fly, with only different fleet tags? You guys are gonna balance everything to the point that the only difference is ICC:pulse, UGTO:flux, K'luth:cloak, elf.

Diversity is what makes the game good, no great. ICC gets the Jump Cruiser, and if you want to play with it, feel free to join S.W. If it frightens you......good.

Bito

_________________


Puppies gotta die, too.

NightDragon
Cadet

Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 893
Posted: 2004-03-06 14:59   
as is the WH isnt good for inner system travel its rather a waste, and also mkaes it really easy to chase or counter attack
_________________
\"Experience is a tough teacher. She gives the test first and the lesson after.\"
~ William H. O

Wyke {ThorsHammer}
Cadet

Joined: February 22, 2003
Posts: 416
Posted: 2004-03-06 16:35   

On friday, I was building Valentine in Cincinnati, when I was on the receiving end of a roaming JC first bombing, then capping and using a wormhole to bring in a small fleet to help defend the new acquisition.

We on UGTO used our two shipyards on (Censored by UGTO Counter-Intelligence) and (Censored by UGTO Counter-Intelligence) to bring in re-enforcements and it lead to a some good battling before we recapped.

I thought it rather creative and despite at the time thinking Argh ... the ICC should keep it. It didnt provide an unfair advantage, just an tactical option and it has been traded for the PCM stacking, a not insignificant loss.


_________________


  Email Wyke {ThorsHammer}
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
Page created in 0.010746 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR