Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +5.0 Days

Search

Anniversaries

21th - Chubba

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Dev proposal: New GA-only ship
 Author Dev proposal: New GA-only ship
Tzunamii {Cmdr}
Cadet

Joined: February 07, 2004
Posts: 28
Posted: 2004-05-26 06:06   
Hello all!

I've dug through all the posts regarding new ship/station for the rank of Grand Admiral (GA) and found out that almost everyone is having an opinion of what features such a 'monster' should have.

As there's no way to please all I say we shouldn't even try. There's a simple solution to this - let the GA's have more flexibility to shape his/hers ship to what role the GA's either needs for the moment OR feels most comfortable to play as. In my experiance there's alot of different GA playingstyles out there (maul ships, supply friendlys, strategic command etc).

I know there will be more limitations on certain slots in the next patch, but there will also be more flexibility in others (weapon slots for instance).

In my opionion a GA ship should be multipurpose and be something like the Command Dreadnaught, but have greater survivability.


Titan-class vessel (ICC/UGTO)
-----------------------------------

- Larger in-game hull-size than a Dreadnaught
- Twice the Heavy Armor than a Dreadnaught
- Primary AND Secondary shielding (ICC only)
- Half the turningspeed of a Dreadnaught

- Cargohold: 10 items/infantry

- Tractorbeam (1)
- EW slots (3)
- Reloads (2)
- Build (1)

- Auxillery Power Generator (1)

- Fighterbays (12)
- Mines (2)

Weapon-slots:

- 2 Small Forward/Port Arc
- 2 Small Forward/Starboard Arc
- 2 Small Aft/Port Arc
- 2 Small Aft/Starboard Arc

- 8 Medium Port Arc
- 8 Medium Starboard Arc
- 8 Medium Aft Arc

- 4 Large Full Arc
- 6 Large Port Arc
- 6 Large Starboard Arc
- 6 Large Aft Arc


[ ** Weapons edited ** ]


Conclusion:

This vessel will have good survivability, but it won't be overpowered when it comes to weapons. It sure can't outrun any enemy and it's not powerful enough to destroy multiple ships with ease and it's sure can't outmanouver anything execpt a station. No bomb-slots also minimizes the possible threat of having such a giant in orbit killing off anything on a planet without being able to kill it quickly. Also, I would suggest it's explosion, when it does gets destroyed, will be quite large so smaller vessels won't do close-up attacking to often.

A slow reloading jumpdrive and slightly slower topspeed of a Dreadnaught could also be used to hamper this 'weapons-platform'.

The Reloads/build will make it a multipurpose ship which can be modded into any role _any_ Grand Admiral wants.


I want to thank my fleet (=IT=) for all it's input regarding this proposal.


Regards,

/Tzunamii.


[ This Message was edited by: Tzunamii {HC} on 2004-05-26 08:42 ]
_________________

< Ecce homo. Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum. Pax Vobiscum. Esto perpetua >

Pope
Fleet Admiral

Joined: June 11, 2002
Posts: 2449
From: World of tomorrow
Posted: 2004-05-26 06:44   
In terms of .482, your ship is totally underarmed. Also, the Team is trying to move away from Full Slots.

The ship can have all the armor and hull it wants, as long as it is that slow, it will be FOOD and a primary Target. So, exactly what a GA needs, right? (note: NO sarcasm!)

It is a self-supplying miner. Not going to happen i think.

As has been said before: Wait until you see .482.



_________________


Tzunamii {Cmdr}
Cadet

Joined: February 07, 2004
Posts: 28
Posted: 2004-05-26 06:55   
Well, thank you for your constructive criticism and I will be looking forward to .482.

I will revise my suggestion after the patch of course.

/Tzunamii.

_________________

< Ecce homo. Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum. Pax Vobiscum. Esto perpetua >

Page created in 0.007456 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR