| Author |
{RIP}FA/GA Scenario Server |
Captain Caveman
Cadet
Joined: October 12, 2002
Posts: 668
|  Posted: 2005-04-12 02:43
RIP old friend.
_________________
|
Lark of Serenity
Grand Admiral
Raven Warriors
Joined: June 02, 2002
Posts: 2516
| Posted: 2005-04-12 08:00
erm, just one question...
i dont suppose extending the time limit would of helped any?
but yeah, RIP FA server. Had a lot of fun there, brutally hunting down UGTO dreads with a Siphon, doing crazy things like have 20 supply ships follow a station around, Coombie always crashing the server with his minelayer Hive...
good times, good times.
_________________
Admiral Larky, The Wolf
Don't play with fire, play with Larky.
Raven Division Command - 1st Division
|
BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2005-04-12 11:49
time limit cant be extended (correct me if im wrong tael). Each map is on a set timelimit. Would result in an update...which, I know I couldnt be bothered to do....
_________________
|
Barthezzz
Fleet Admiral
Joined: May 31, 2001
Posts: 5630
From: The Netherlands
| Posted: 2005-04-12 12:17
Quote:
|
On 2005-04-12 11:49, BackSlash *Jack* wrote:
time limit cant be extended (correct me if im wrong tael). Each map is on a set timelimit. Would result in an update...which, I know I couldnt be bothered to do....
|
|
Player maps can set their timelimits to what ever they want.
So im sure Official maps have the same option.
Setting it to say 24 hours would solve everything.
Also, people want FA around because they know how much ass it kicked before it got shot in the head.
MV = suck. FA = (was) win.
_________________
|
Coeus {NCX-Charger}
Admiral, I can't read,
Sundered Weimeriners
Joined: February 16, 2004
Posts: 3635
From: South Philly
| Posted: 2005-04-12 13:57
I think they've made it pretty clear that it is NOT an option, what part of that don't you people get? Read the previous posts before posting.
_________________
Darkspace: Twilight
|
Barthezzz
Fleet Admiral
Joined: May 31, 2001
Posts: 5630
From: The Netherlands
| Posted: 2005-04-12 17:25
Quote:
|
On 2005-04-12 13:57, Coeus wrote:
I think they've made it pretty clear that it is NOT an option, what part of that don't you people get? Read the previous posts before posting.
|
|
Compare the playerbase quantity between today and the one a few months after the beta ended.
I think youll find the answer 
_________________
|
Tbone
Grand Admiral
Joined: July 21, 2001
Posts: 1756
From: Vancouver
| Posted: 2005-04-12 18:07
Quote:
|
On 2005-04-12 17:25, Barth3zzz [Got P13?] wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-04-12 13:57, Coeus wrote:
I think they've made it pretty clear that it is NOT an option, what part of that don't you people get? Read the previous posts before posting.
|
|
Compare the playerbase quantity between today and the one a few months after the beta ended.
I think youll find the answer
|
|
Answer to what? The answer to "what part of that don't you get?" is "we had more players back then" ?????
_________________
|
Tael
2nd Rear Admiral
Palestar
Joined: July 03, 2002
Posts: 3695
From: San Francisco Bay Area
| Posted: 2005-04-12 18:15
Official servers run as processes and the scenarios they run are hard coded into the code in a set sequence and time. We have no way of "tweaking" them. Thats what we keep trying to explain. Player servers run individual servers that run imported or edited maps, but dont have access to the Zone Backend processes for running over multiple systems like the master servers do.
FA/GA is gone, for the past several days there has rarely been more than 3 people on it. We've decided instead to use that resource to host the Fleetwars Event server as some people complained of issues with the privately operated one in Europe.
_________________
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
