Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +1.8 Days

Search

Anniversaries

20th - Relient
19th - Entil-Zha the Starkiller

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » fighters
 Author fighters
42861
Grand Admiral

Joined: November 13, 2003
Posts: 32
From: Netherlands
Posted: 2008-02-11 00:30   
after having another look at the Development log I noticed the removal of level 2 and 3 fighter bases on planets so there will be less fighter lag.. I personally think it would be a shame to only have a level 1 fighter base that would loose it's usefulness once level 3 defense bases come up, since the choice isn't that difficult between a level 1 fighter base and a level 3 defense base..

I've been thinking, and wouldn't it be possible to create a "fighter squadron" consisting of 2 or 3 fighters "molded" together, sharing coördinates, so there will effectively be the same amount of data being processed (no lag). (you could even make new models that look like 2 or 3 fighters but are actually just one 3d model with a weapons-hardpoint for every individual fighter. once the model that looks like 3 fighters is hit, it'll be replaced by the model that looks like 2 fighters, etc. Shouldn't be too hard to program(I'm a programmer myself))

I wonder what the devs think about this (in my opinion) very doable solution.

Planets need some accurate weaponry against invaders, not only slow moving missiles...

*note that this is also about Fighters in general and decreasing lag caused by them. This might reduce "fighter lag" by large amounts. especially when taking carrier dreads and support stations into account*





[ This Message was edited by: *VA*42861 on 2008-02-11 00:40 ]
_________________


Leonide
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: October 01, 2005
Posts: 1553
From: Newport News, Virginia
Posted: 2008-02-11 00:33   
i believe defense base 3's have been removed as well.
_________________


captain of the ICC Assault Cruiser C.S.S. Sledgehammer

  Email Leonide
Ospolos
Grand Admiral

Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 567
From: ON, CANADA
Posted: 2008-02-11 13:01   
or just make one stronger?

Plus, multiple models wouldn't change the graphic lag created by them anyway.

EDIT: less missiles fired (Or no missiles at all) would fix the fighter lag, as long as the defense base launched one strong one.

[ This Message was edited by: Ospolos on 2008-02-11 13:03 ]
_________________
Honoured,
Osp

doda *EP5 no longer exception...*
Grand Admiral

Joined: December 11, 2005
Posts: 1012
From: happy land
Posted: 2008-02-11 21:01   
I thought fighters were going to be using cannons now
_________________
Please resize your Admin - signature
VCA since June 5th 06

Ospolos
Grand Admiral

Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 567
From: ON, CANADA
Posted: 2008-02-11 22:40   
Quote:

On 2008-02-11 21:01, doda *EP5* (No Longer Exception...) wrote:
I thought fighters were going to be using cannons now




No one saying otherwise, I am just stating that missiles are what causes big heaps of lag with fighters, especually in large numbers. They should be cannons as far as I know.
_________________
Honoured,
Osp

42861
Grand Admiral

Joined: November 13, 2003
Posts: 32
From: Netherlands
Posted: 2008-02-12 00:45   
Quote:

On 2008-02-11 13:01, Ospolos wrote:
multiple models wouldn't change the graphic lag created by them anyway.
[ This Message was edited by: Ospolos on 2008-02-11 13:03 ]




By molding 3 fighters together in a single model, there will effectively be only óne fighter that looks like 3. It'll reduce the cpu workload of both the processor and GPU, since every single object in darkspace uses coördinates and requires calculations.. less objects means less lag
_________________


BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2008-02-12 03:20   
There are only Fighter Bases now. We've removed FB 1 through 3 because we think it's silly to have that many, and we want to lower the amount of CPU usage used up by fighters - hence, we spawn less.
_________________


42861
Grand Admiral

Joined: November 13, 2003
Posts: 32
From: Netherlands
Posted: 2008-02-12 06:11   
I understand...

However, will they not be too weak to be considered as effective defenses then? One of the things I like the most when building planets is creating an effective defense against invaders.. I mean.. a planet should be able to launch more fighters than spaceships do, should they not? (or at least be stronger in that department)
_________________


Page created in 0.019142 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR