| Author |
Legendary Ark bugFixed? |
Zero28
Grand Admiral
Joined: August 25, 2006
Posts: 591
|  Posted: 2010-04-27 11:11
-Fixed infamous ARC bug where missiles hitting on the front of a ship would damage the rear.
Does this mean now IT's will damage the actual Ark it hits? i tough that was intentional
how did you fix that? for i don't know how long this bug was known 
_________________
19:33:51 [ZION]GothThug {C?}: "Zero..you are DS's hero"
|
BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2010-04-27 11:13
Yes, missiles now damage the arc that they hit.
Send thanks and flowers to Faustus.
[ This Message was edited by: BackSlash on 2010-04-27 11:14 ]
_________________
|
Zero28
Grand Admiral
Joined: August 25, 2006
Posts: 591
| Posted: 2010-04-27 11:30
*THrows FLower bouquet into faustus face*
Ok well i has 1 questions about missile, and i heard 2 Different answers for it,
Does AR pack more punch than Its?
_________________
19:33:51 [ZION]GothThug {C?}: "Zero..you are DS's hero"
|
Eledore Massis [R33]
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights
Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 2694
From: tsohlacoLocalhost
| Posted: 2010-04-27 12:16
Quote:
| On 2010-04-27 11:30, Zero28 wrote:
Does AR pack more punch than Its? |
|
No.
Not trying to blame Tael, but i have noticed him saying that AR's do more damage. But that was in the past and the value's have changed.
IT's do the most damage on impact.
IT's have the biggest blast damage.
IT's have ~2730 Gu range and move at 70 Gu/s.
AR's have ~1275 Gu range and move at 85 Gu/s.
AR's turn almost two and a half times, faster then a IT.
That is all the info i can give you. and plz don't ask about the K'Luth missiles, i don't know em out of my head.
_________________
DS Discordion
|
G.Adm. Kirk
Grand Admiral
Courageous Elite Commandos
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 91
From: Baton Rouge, LA
| Posted: 2010-04-27 12:45
IIRC, the lore about the IT's hitting the engine trails was created to explain the glitch- kind of like eccm pinging.
Kudos on getting it fixed.
[ This Message was edited by: G.Adm. Kirk on 2010-04-27 12:46 ]
_________________
|
Sixkiller
Marshal
Courageous Elite Commandos
Joined: May 11, 2005
Posts: 1786
From: Netherlands
| Posted: 2010-04-27 12:46
Doubt that.
Ion Engine's
Ion Tracker missile.
Makes sense to me:p
_________________
|
Gejaheline
Fleet Admiral
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 19, 2005
Posts: 1127
From: UGTO MUNIN HQ, Mars
| Posted: 2010-04-27 13:22
Quote:
|
On 2010-04-27 12:46, Sixkiller wrote:
Doubt that.
Ion Engine's
Ion Tracker missile.
Makes sense to me:p
|
|
Ion engines.
Ion tracker missiles.
Magically hit the rear armour, even when approaching the target from the front.
Heat-seeking missiles in real-life just aim at hot things, rather than specifically looping around to hit aircraft directly in the engines. I'd assume that IT missiles do the same.
_________________
[Darkspace Moderator] [Galactic Navy Fleet Officer]
|
Nightsabre
Marshal
Joined: February 21, 2005
Posts: 66
| Posted: 2010-04-27 13:31
Where does it say this is fixed? I dont see it posted anywhere unless its old.
_________________
|
ssj4megaman
Grand Admiral
Joined: January 06, 2003
Posts: 54
From: San Diego
| Posted: 2010-04-27 13:36
Quote:
|
On 2010-04-27 13:31, Nightsabre wrote:
Where does it say this is fixed? I dont see it posted anywhere unless its old.
|
|
hit the dev log button on the left size..... its shows the *patches*
i cannot believe this bug has finally been squashed its been soo many years lol
_________________
|
Zero28
Grand Admiral
Joined: August 25, 2006
Posts: 591
| Posted: 2010-04-27 13:37
its a hotfix in the current release
OK thanks for showing me the light.
and i don't care about Kluth missiles much
_________________
19:33:51 [ZION]GothThug {C?}: "Zero..you are DS's hero"
|
Shigernafy
Admiral
Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 5726
From: The Land of Taxation without Representation
| Posted: 2010-04-27 15:24
That fix alone should really warrant its own version number.
_________________
* [S.W]AdmBito @55321 Sent \"I dunno; the French had a few missteps. But they're on the right track, one headbutt at a time.\"
|
Zero28
Grand Admiral
Joined: August 25, 2006
Posts: 591
| Posted: 2010-04-27 15:51
speakign of misiles (a bit off topic too) Willt he current description will be eventually changed soon of nearly all gadgets and weapons? hey sometime throw noobs in confusion
_________________
19:33:51 [ZION]GothThug {C?}: "Zero..you are DS's hero"
|
Borgie
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 2256
From: close by
| Posted: 2010-04-27 17:51
this is good news thanks faust
[ This Message was edited by: Fatal Borgie on 2010-04-27 17:51 ]
_________________
|
Azreal
Chief Marshal
Joined: March 14, 2004
Posts: 2816
From: United State of Texas, Houston
| Posted: 2010-04-27 17:59
Quote:
|
On 2010-04-27 13:22, Gejaheline wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2010-04-27 12:46, Sixkiller wrote:
Doubt that.
Ion Engine's
Ion Tracker missile.
Makes sense to me:p
|
|
Ion engines.
Ion tracker missiles.
Magically hit the rear armour, even when approaching the target from the front.
Heat-seeking missiles in real-life just aim at hot things, rather than specifically looping around to hit aircraft directly in the engines. I'd assume that IT missiles do the same.
|
|
Yes, but does a heat seeking missle ignore the nose of the craft it had to pass through in order to hit the engine, leaving no damage to the nose, and damaging only the rear. That is what was happening.
All the same, thank you for fixing the BUG that was supposedly unfixxable, thus spurning all of these great attempts at covering up a bad bug with bad fairy tails. 
_________________
bucket link
|
Scorched Soul[+R]
Marshal
Pitch Black
Joined: November 14, 2005
Posts: 378
From: USA, NJ, Princeton
| Posted: 2010-04-27 18:03
Epic news i wish i could send celebratory presents to anyone who helped fix it
[ This Message was edited by: Scorched Soul on 2010-04-27 18:03 ]
_________________
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
