Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


94% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
04/27/24 +3.7 Days

Search

Anniversaries

21th - James Bum007

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Beta Testing Discussion » » 100% PD barren
 Author 100% PD barren
DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2011-05-09 16:14   
I have successfully built a 100%PD barren, with a little exploit power bug.
Progress
  1. Reach 70 pop with 2 biosphere and 80 tech, then build variance and Bomb I.
  2. Upgrade 2 biosphere to 2 automated and drop to 50 pop, continue to build bomb I.
  3. Delete Cortex and Subscpace, build bomb I until the planet reaches 100%.

Result
  • 1 Colony + 1 Lab + 2 Automated Farm + 4 dome + 4 variance = 50 food + 50 pop + 20 tech + 210 power.
  • 20 Bomb 1 = 100% PD.

Status
  • Worker: 50/41/+9
  • Power: 210/210/0

With 100% PD, a barren is an absolute defense. No matter how many bomber are bombing, it is not harmed. No matter how many red inf are landing, they can not raze any structure or kill any green inf on it. It's just a barren. You must bring at least 4 stations to capture it because of 32 inf = 3.2 ships.

Hereby announcing the fact, I suggest:
Bomb I
  • 3% PD
  • 20 tech
  • 20 power
  • 1 worker

Bomb II
  • 6% PD
  • 60 tech
  • 30 power
  • 4 worker

Hydrid I
  • 2% PD
  • 40 tech
  • 15 power
  • 2 worker

Hydrid II
  • 5% PD
  • 80 tech
  • 25 power
  • 5 worker

Offense I
  • 1% PD
  • 30 tech
  • 10 power
  • 3 worker

Offense II
  • 4% PD
  • 70 tech
  • 20 power
  • 6 worker

Bomb, Hydrid, Offense requires highest power, technology, worker respectively. Build at X technology and function at X technology; unlike build at X technology and function unless X-10 technology. I suggest so because I notice Hydrid II or Bomb I are everywhere due to its soft requirement.

Interdictor, Sensor ought to have its requirement adjusted too, but it's not crucial.

I didn't test with ICC shield generator because you can't have 100% PD with a shield on a barren and you don't need shield on 100% PD planet. I think we may remove planetary shield and planetary anti-sensor out of the game.

I didn't test on Ice/Ocean/Arid/Terran in binary system so I don't know what is the maximum PD one can get.
[ This Message was edited by: chlorophyll on 2011-05-09 16:45 ]
_________________


BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2011-05-09 16:27   
This won't be possible after the next update. Max is 80% with 20x PD I's.
_________________


Tommas [ USF HunnyBunny ]
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: February 04, 2006
Posts: 581
From: Norway
Posted: 2011-05-09 16:33   
Well the planet still do zero damage i recon so it will only stop bombing and inf rushing..but 4 ships or ai is still easy cap..
_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2011-05-09 17:44   
Quote:

On 2011-05-09 16:33, Tommas [ USF HunnyBunny ] wrote:
Well the planet still do zero damage i recon so it will only stop bombing and inf rushing..but 4 ships or ai is still easy cap..




Not as easy as it used to be.




-Ent
_________________


MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1912
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2011-05-09 20:06   
Quote:


I didn't test with ICC shield generator because you can't have 100% PD with a shield on a barren and you don't need shield on 100% PD planet. I think we may remove planetary shield and planetary anti-sensor out of the game.



Why don't you need shield on a 100% PD planet? I've been told PD is not point defense (chance to shoot down bombs and inf), but planetary defense which is damage reduction.

Is it that 100% PD means bombs and enemy infantry do zero damage? That's messed up if true.
[ This Message was edited by: General Zod on 2011-05-09 20:07 ]
_________________


Reznor
Marshal

Joined: March 29, 2010
Posts: 316
Posted: 2011-05-10 15:03   
Quote:

On 2011-05-09 20:06, General Zod wrote:
Quote:


I didn't test with ICC shield generator because you can't have 100% PD with a shield on a barren and you don't need shield on 100% PD planet. I think we may remove planetary shield and planetary anti-sensor out of the game.



Why don't you need shield on a 100% PD planet? I've been told PD is not point defense (chance to shoot down bombs and inf), but planetary defense which is damage reduction.

Is it that 100% PD means bombs and enemy infantry do zero damage? That's messed up if true.
[ This Message was edited by: General Zod on 2011-05-09 20:07 ]




Yes, it does zero damage. It also gives a bonus to allied infantry, meaning that ENEMY infantry do no damage either.



Planets need more bite, imo.
_________________
Indictor: 1. To accuse of wrongdoing

Interdictor: (DS) A planetary emplacement or Cruiser Class vessel capable of preventing FTL travel in a certain radius.

Steveyk
Chief Marshal
Non Omnis Moriar


Joined: November 25, 2008
Posts: 162
Posted: 2011-05-10 18:30   
It's 100% pointless defence.


_________________


  Email Steveyk
MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1912
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2011-05-10 18:31   
More anti ship, less damage reduction IMO. 80% is too much considering how easy it is to attain, and 100% is obviously broken. On the flipside, stations built with offense bases, especially level II offense bases, aren't enough of a threat.

Offense bases need more damage and range.
_________________


Page created in 0.019828 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR