Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +4.6 Days

Search

Anniversaries

22th - Tellaris
17th - Oskar von Reuenthal

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » ICC and supply lines
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
 Author ICC and supply lines
Crim
Fleet Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: March 16, 2003
Posts: 1336
Posted: 2011-07-04 18:11   
Quote:

On 2011-07-04 17:17, Talien wrote:
Quote:

On 2011-07-04 15:21, Crim, the OG Crim wrote:
In the coming patch Reactive shields get a boost to resistances, making them the best defense around. Even still, the recharge speed now still makes them the better defensive choice



A sheet of paper with good resistances is still a sheet of paper. The HP on reactives seems to be around half of actives, which is 90% of armor HP according to devs. It makes reactives a far better choice for Destroyers/Frigates/Scouts and makes them actually viable for most Cruisers, but for ships that are going to be taking a lot of fire they don't work so good unless you're loaded with defense enhancements.

Not to say the change wasn't good, it was, and will make smaller ICC ships much more capable, it's just not the be all-end all of defensive systems.



In an ICC ship you aught to be loaded out with defense enhancements as it is. The next patch will make Darkspace a game of attrition and supply lines. With shields and defense enhancements, ICC will have a leg up on the other factions. And they're not exactly sheets of paper when used right. An experienced ICC player will know how to rotate shields correctly and use their defensive mode when the time comes, so it doesn't have as much HP as armor at the start, but by the end armor comes out looking rather crappy compared to shields.
_________________


CM7
Midshipman
Faster than Light


Joined: October 15, 2009
Posts: 1812
Posted: 2011-07-04 18:41   
as it should? der
_________________
Defiance and Opposition, a tribute to teamwork. I will remember always
339,144

An Fiach
Admiral

Joined: November 01, 2009
Posts: 32
Posted: 2011-07-04 20:43   
Quote:

On 2011-07-04 18:11, Crim, the OG Crim wrote:

In an ICC ship you aught to be loaded out with defense enhancements as it is.


Well no, enh are just that, enh. They shouldn't have anything to do with how base ratings are established nor should their benefits be seen as requirements for any faction. A ship aught to be loaded out with whatever enh the player feels matches his/her style. ICC has nice shields but they shouldn't be expected to turtle up, just as UGTO shouldn't be expected to go only for fire power or Luth to hide.

I'm not arguing any of the other points, I don't have the knowledge or experience to claim to know how it should be balanced.
_________________


Blackjack [DBL]
Grand Admiral
Faster than Light


Joined: February 25, 2011
Posts: 344
From: The land of venomous reptiles.
Posted: 2011-07-05 06:21   
I agree with Fiach, each faction must have a speciality but it shouldn't be the ONLY way to win.

[ This Message was edited by: Perseverance *FCA* on 2011-07-05 06:21 ]
_________________

Names I used: Da Bes Loser, Perseverance, Loyalty.

$yTHe {C?}
Grand Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: September 29, 2002
Posts: 1292
From: Arlington, VA
Posted: 2011-07-05 10:44   
Why is everyone in this thread spelling "ought" as "aught"? That is really the interesting thing in the entire thread.
_________________


Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2011-07-05 12:16   
Quote:

On 2011-07-04 18:11, Crim, the OG Crim wrote:
In an ICC ship you aught to be loaded out with defense enhancements as it is. The next patch will make Darkspace a game of attrition and supply lines. With shields and defense enhancements, ICC will have a leg up on the other factions. And they're not exactly sheets of paper when used right. An experienced ICC player will know how to rotate shields correctly and use their defensive mode when the time comes, so it doesn't have as much HP as armor at the start, but by the end armor comes out looking rather crappy compared to shields.



A few ICC players make armor look crappy compared to shields in the current version, but that's a result of playstyle and not enhancements. Yes, in 1.67 an AD loaded with defense enh and using reactives with defense mode will be able to go toe to toe with any other ship but not everyone wants to fly an AD and do that. That same strategy does not work so well with other ships, Cruisers and smaller will still get mauled at close range even with full def enh loadouts because of the vast increase in damage output, and if you're not at close range then you're better off using enh to boost your damage output or speed/turning.
_________________
Adapt or die.

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
Page created in 0.016975 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR