Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
04/27/24 +4.0 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » ICC shield tech
Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page )
 Author ICC shield tech
[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2011-08-20 14:55   
Currently the shielding for icc is well "like wet paper" i mean ok we can rotate power but to a faction that use sheilds instead of vast ammounts of armour there pritty bad and with ugto having there armour buffed icc could do with sheild's being buffed some what now ide suggest just a 10-20% increase in strenght this would also help compansate for the icc -10% weapon damge.
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
Posted: 2011-08-20 15:29   
ICC shields are fine.
_________________


Azure Prower
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 14, 2006
Posts: 309
Posted: 2011-08-20 15:34   
When I play ICC, I don't even bother rotating my shields any more. Just play like UGTO and rotate your ship.

[ This Message was edited by: Azure Prower on 2011-08-20 15:34 ]
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/AzurePrower

Azreal
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 14, 2004
Posts: 2816
From: United State of Texas, Houston
Posted: 2011-08-20 15:43   
rely on jump drive and not shields or armor. U will die far less....
_________________
bucket link



  Email Azreal   Goto the website of Azreal
jimjimjaroo
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 06, 2009
Posts: 308
From: Michigan, USA
Posted: 2011-08-20 15:49   
Quote:

On 2011-08-20 15:43, Azreal wrote:
rely on jump drive and not shields or armor. U will die far less....



you sound like someone from kluth but your right though.
_________________


[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2011-08-20 15:52   
yeh but to rely on jd isnt really that good when u can be follwed and or want to fidht i mean the ads sheilds are really poor
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
CM7
Midshipman
Faster than Light


Joined: October 15, 2009
Posts: 1812
Posted: 2011-08-20 17:11   
ICC shields are fine. We are able to regnerate them quickly and cover any holes in our defense.

a parasite can hull a HC in two alphas if the HC does not rotate shields.
It takes seven alphas to hull a HC if we do rotate.

a BC(UGTO) is hulled in 3 alphas from a parasite.

9 alphas and a BC(border cruiser) is stripped of all its armor.

10 alphas and a HC is stripped of all its shields and armor.


seems low, but then we can regenerate our shields quickly too...

UGTO specialized armor out preforms shields when dealing with specialized damage, but again, shields outlast armor in the long run through regeneration.

What your experiencing is that shields go away REALY fast now. The other two factions are dealing with the same issue, exept without being able to regenerate their defiense as fast.
_________________
Defiance and Opposition, a tribute to teamwork. I will remember always
339,144

Whiterin
Fleet Admiral

Joined: November 15, 2007
Posts: 146
Posted: 2011-08-21 03:59   
Quote:

On 2011-08-20 17:11, *XO*Defiance{CM7} wrote:
ICC shields are fine. We are able to regnerate them quickly and cover any holes in our defense.

a parasite can hull a HC in two alphas if the HC does not rotate shields.
It takes seven alphas to hull a HC if we do rotate.

a BC(UGTO) is hulled in 3 alphas from a parasite.

9 alphas and a BC(border cruiser) is stripped of all its armor.

10 alphas and a HC is stripped of all its shields and armor.


seems low, but then we can regenerate our shields quickly too...

UGTO specialized armor out preforms shields when dealing with specialized damage, but again, shields outlast armor in the long run through regeneration.

What your experiencing is that shields go away REALY fast now. The other two factions are dealing with the same issue, exept without being able to regenerate their defiense as fast.




The other two factions also do a TON more damage then ICC does.
_________________


[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2011-08-21 05:04   


[/quote]

The other two factions also do a TON more damage then ICC does.

[/quote]

+1 thats what i mean it wouldnt be so bad ifwe had better defneces
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Forger of Destiny
Chief Marshal
We Kick Arse


Joined: October 10, 2009
Posts: 826
Posted: 2011-08-21 05:10   
maybe increasing hp and energy consumption of active shields could help. tradeoff could be removal of energy and psi resistance from active shields. that way we have a strong shield and a regenerative shield as options.

also ammo constraints on cannons are getting annoying if they are supposed to be dealing damage over time...can atleast gauss gun lose ammo limits?
on the other hand i think particle cannons should get ammo limits on it. that should help stop the ugto gunships from firing forever with no substantial issues and dealing good damage (nemesis and lithium im looking at you).
[ This Message was edited by: Inactive-002 on 2011-08-21 05:13 ]
_________________
Forging legends and lives outside till naught remains inside.


[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2011-08-21 05:33   
All that needs to be done is give the shields a 10-20% more go an maybe a lol more resistance because of the damage nerf.
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
jimjimjaroo
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 06, 2009
Posts: 308
From: Michigan, USA
Posted: 2011-08-21 05:56   
Quote:

On 2011-08-21 05:33, RogueAvenger10 wrote:
All that needs to be done is give the shields a 10-20% more go an maybe a lol more resistance because of the damage nerf.


resistence i can agree on but more shields i'd have to think about that
_________________


[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2011-08-21 06:08   
yeh i mean im not talink lie loads but just enough to make it usefull to have sheilds i mean 4 si pritty much put a active sheild arc lower than 75-80% i mean thats a big blow all at once.
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
jimjimjaroo
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 06, 2009
Posts: 308
From: Michigan, USA
Posted: 2011-08-21 06:15   
Quote:

On 2011-08-21 06:08, RogueAvenger10 wrote:
yeh i mean im not talink lie loads but just enough to make it usefull to have sheilds i mean 4 si pritty much put a active sheild arc lower than 75-80% i mean thats a big blow all at once.


true, but i just got an idea. instead of making the shields stronger, make them have faster regen. not too much though, dont want to make it unfair.
_________________


Hakketak
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 24, 2009
Posts: 301
Posted: 2011-08-21 06:36   
scrap icc shields
give em +50% weapon strenght
lets see about that
_________________
"I shouldn't be alive"

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page )
Page created in 0.018267 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR