| Author |
Planets and 1.7 |
_Sajuuk_
Fleet Admiral
Joined: December 08, 2010
Posts: 38
From: Washington (state) , United States of America
|  Posted: 2013-08-16 12:17
Quote:
On 2013-08-16 09:51, Sheraton *XO* wrote:
Yes there were such planets at one time but they tended to put a very heavy load on the server. The old system of planet defenses was removed for this reason if I recall correctly.
-Sheraton
|
and now they replaced by hordes of AI and defenses that only deadly en mass and if u stay around the planet
_________________
|
Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
| Posted: 2013-08-16 13:00
Quote:
On 2013-08-16 12:17, -Orion- wrote:
Quote:
On 2013-08-16 09:51, Sheraton *XO* wrote:
Yes there were such planets at one time but they tended to put a very heavy load on the server. The old system of planet defenses was removed for this reason if I recall correctly.
-Sheraton
|
and now they replaced by hordes of AI and defenses that only deadly en mass and if u stay around the planet
|
AI take waaaay less load than the planets ever did.
-Ent
_________________
|
Pantheon
Marshal
Palestar
Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 1789
| Posted: 2013-08-18 05:09
Quote:
On 2013-08-16 12:17, -Orion- wrote:
Quote:
On 2013-08-16 09:51, Sheraton *XO* wrote:
Yes there were such planets at one time but they tended to put a very heavy load on the server. The old system of planet defenses was removed for this reason if I recall correctly.
-Sheraton
|
and now they replaced by hordes of AI and defenses that only deadly en mass and if u stay around the planet
|
Planets used to take between 30%-50% of the server load alone. We got them down to 25%-30%, AI don't impact server performance at all as their logic scales depending on the server load at the time (which is why under certain conditions they will faceplant a planet). This is why you sometimes see them sitting still not doing anything.
_________________
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
