Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/11/24 +5.5 Days

Search

Anniversaries

15th - Rise

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » Kluth Shrouds Invisable even with ECCM active
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Next Page )
 Author Kluth Shrouds Invisable even with ECCM active
*Flash*
Chief Marshal

Joined: April 19, 2009
Posts: 291
From: Semi retired after 1.67 !
Posted: 2012-12-22 03:52   
Gang missiles are a joke end of story same as the AI numbers that killed the game.
_________________
In space , no one can hear you scream!


  Email *Flash*
Rykros1987
Fleet Admiral

Joined: October 01, 2012
Posts: 88
From: Not in an asylum. Yet.
Posted: 2012-12-22 09:21   
If what pantheon I think said can be done... about removing the strength of the signal being based off of distance....and making it a flat amount. This might actually fix the problem. I noticed that a lot of the time the shrouds get detected right before they slam into your side and usually its too late by then. If the signal was made to be 100% at any distance it would probably reveal the shrouds earlier resulting in the shrouds still requiring escorts BUT it might fix the flakyness of the shrouds.

>.>
_________________


Hakketak
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 24, 2009
Posts: 301
Posted: 2012-12-22 15:26   
pixies and leprechauns....
_________________
"I shouldn't be alive"

Jim Starluck
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: October 22, 2001
Posts: 2232
From: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: 2012-12-22 17:27   
Quote:

On 2012-12-19 23:10, Pantheon wrote:
There's always going to be latency involved.

Missiles travel at something like 40 gu/s, meaning if you have a seconds worth of lag, it's going to travel 40 gu before it shows up on your client, then another second for PD to react, etc...

99% of the time its an issue with latency, which is not something we can fix.

A scanner will make them show up like christmas tree lights though.



Missiles are closer to an average of 100 gu/sec, actually. 120-ish for the fastest ones, 80-ish for the slowest. So 2-3 seconds of lag are long enough for a missile to scream right through your PD envelope.
_________________
If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger space battleship and try again.

  Email Jim Starluck
Two Face
Marshal

Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 145
Posted: 2012-12-22 20:31   
Quote:

On 2012-12-22 17:27, Jim Starluck wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-12-19 23:10, Pantheon wrote:
There's always going to be latency involved.

Missiles travel at something like 40 gu/s, meaning if you have a seconds worth of lag, it's going to travel 40 gu before it shows up on your client, then another second for PD to react, etc...

99% of the time its an issue with latency, which is not something we can fix.

A scanner will make them show up like christmas tree lights though.



Missiles are closer to an average of 100 gu/sec, actually. 120-ish for the fastest ones, 80-ish for the slowest. So 2-3 seconds of lag are long enough for a missile to scream right through your PD envelope.




So the question everyone faction apart from Kluth wants to know is will it be fixed and if so please add it to the Development Log so its official.
_________________


Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2012-12-22 21:47   
Quote:

On 2012-12-22 09:21, rykros1987 wrote:
If what pantheon I think said can be done... about removing the strength of the signal being based off of distance....and making it a flat amount. This might actually fix the problem. I noticed that a lot of the time the shrouds get detected right before they slam into your side and usually its too late by then. If the signal was made to be 100% at any distance it would probably reveal the shrouds earlier resulting in the shrouds still requiring escorts BUT it might fix the flakyness of the shrouds.

>.>



You realize that this will affect your little bomber frigates and ECM scouts too? With this, Kluth dreads can simply choose the right moment to decloak next to those ships and instagib them just like snap.


_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2012-12-22 23:09   
Quote:
On 2012-12-21 11:41, Pantheon wrote:
If the damage isn't dealt on the server, the client will ultimately not receive any damage, but we have to interp for latency with everything, so if the client doesn't PD them for whatever reason due to their latency or a mixture of things - they will take damage on their client. However, the server controls when a ship is destroyed, not your client.

You could, in theory, hack the client to make everyone's hull read 0 hp or 0%, but only the server sends out the ship destroyed command. This is why it can sometimes seem like a ship is at 0% hull but won't die. Your client is interpreting what's going on, but due to the latency an entire salvo may have hit a new armor arc or one of many other scenarios.


I had been 0% and not destroyed for some times. You have answered the case. Thanks.

Pantheon's explanation pretty covers our concerns. Because of latency, we should pick the correct moment and right strategy before engageing in the battle.

Well, I had bad latency, ISP and slow computer both takes part. But, I don't hestitate to join the battle in spawn-free-ships. Frigate, scout, transport... I can die in these ships for many time without unrest. Of course I can be dead by an alpha. But since I wasn't disturbed by prestige, I still feel serenity and enjoy playing.
[ This Message was edited by: chlorophyll on 2012-12-22 23:18 ]
_________________


Walrus of Apathy
Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: August 07, 2005
Posts: 466
From: Dorans Basement
Posted: 2012-12-23 01:31   
Quote:

On 2012-12-22 20:31, *Two Face* wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-12-22 17:27, Jim Starluck wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-12-19 23:10, Pantheon wrote:
There's always going to be latency involved.

Missiles travel at something like 40 gu/s, meaning if you have a seconds worth of lag, it's going to travel 40 gu before it shows up on your client, then another second for PD to react, etc...

99% of the time its an issue with latency, which is not something we can fix.

A scanner will make them show up like christmas tree lights though.



Missiles are closer to an average of 100 gu/sec, actually. 120-ish for the fastest ones, 80-ish for the slowest. So 2-3 seconds of lag are long enough for a missile to scream right through your PD envelope.




So the question everyone faction apart from Kluth wants to know is will it be fixed and if so please add it to the Development Log so its official.



It's latency, it can't just be fixed liked that. Latency is a part of internet gaming. While the "server controls all system" makes DS somewhat more vulnerable to latency arguably, in return the game is effectively unhackable, and in my opinion it's worth it.

Imagine if DS had massive hacking issues, like DayZ perhaps. You'd be having a lot less fun then than you are now just getting hit by errant missiles every once and awhile.

[ This Message was edited by: Walrus of Apathy on 2012-12-23 01:32 ]
_________________


  Email Walrus of Apathy
Forger of Destiny
Chief Marshal
We Kick Arse


Joined: October 10, 2009
Posts: 826
Posted: 2012-12-23 05:48   
increase the signature of shroud missiles to -1.0. problem solved.
_________________
Forging legends and lives outside till naught remains inside.


Pantheon
Marshal
Palestar


Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 1789
Posted: 2012-12-23 05:50   
Quote:

On 2012-12-23 05:48, Mike Paradox wrote:
increase the signature of shroud missiles to -1.0. problem solved.




Won't solve the problem.
_________________


Hakketak
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 24, 2009
Posts: 301
Posted: 2012-12-23 06:59   
make shooting the missles a graphical effect only and let client decide that once missles are withing a pd range, they get shot in random order, in other words the client lets u render laser fire and renders the missle disappearing, with lag may not always go right, but on the dmg side the client alrdy decided they are shot, so therefor only the graphical effect on shooting the missles may go wrong
_________________
"I shouldn't be alive"

Pantheon
Marshal
Palestar


Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 1789
Posted: 2012-12-23 07:17   
Quote:

On 2012-12-23 06:59, Ubawaus wrote:
make shooting the missles a graphical effect only and let client decide that once missles are withing a pd range, they get shot in random order, in other words the client lets u render laser fire and renders the missle disappearing, with lag may not always go right, but on the dmg side the client alrdy decided they are shot, so therefor only the graphical effect on shooting the missles may go wrong




Very hackable. There's a reason everything we do is server-side.
_________________


Rykros1987
Fleet Admiral

Joined: October 01, 2012
Posts: 88
From: Not in an asylum. Yet.
Posted: 2012-12-23 12:13   
Quote:

On 2012-12-22 21:47, Kenny_Naboo[+R] wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-12-22 09:21, rykros1987 wrote:
If what pantheon I think said can be done... about removing the strength of the signal being based off of distance....and making it a flat amount. This might actually fix the problem. I noticed that a lot of the time the shrouds get detected right before they slam into your side and usually its too late by then. If the signal was made to be 100% at any distance it would probably reveal the shrouds earlier resulting in the shrouds still requiring escorts BUT it might fix the flakyness of the shrouds.

>.>



You realize that this will affect your little bomber frigates and ECM scouts too? With this, Kluth dreads can simply choose the right moment to decloak next to those ships and instagib them just like snap.






Actually it wouldn't make it easier to target them unless the kluth were using eccm. The signals would still be as strong ecm/eccm wise. Just distance no longer factors into it. Besides most kluth ships just point jump on top of your ecm pulse revealing you at min visibility range and fry you anyhow so not much dif. Also the cloaked way they tend to just approach your pulse then when they see you visually they uncloak and spray.
_________________


Pantheon
Marshal
Palestar


Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 1789
Posted: 2012-12-23 12:27   
I've just changed the natural signature of the Shroud Missile to -0.5 from -2.5. Changed should go into beta whenever a build next goes out.
_________________


Two Face
Marshal

Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 145
Posted: 2012-12-23 13:28   
Thanks
_________________


Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Next Page )
Page created in 0.018754 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR