| Author |
New Sagittarian Layout draft |
Pyruvic
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United
Joined: May 30, 2005
Posts: 18
From: CST - USA
|  Posted: 2010-06-16 16:11
If you're going to put AI in the Procyon and Rogens transfer systems, then you should probably put some sort of AI in the Ursa transfer system just to even it out. :/
_________________
|
Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights
Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
| Posted: 2010-06-16 16:47
New layout looks good, everyone seems to have equal access to everything.
_________________
Adapt or die.
|
SpaceAdmiral
Grand Admiral
Joined: May 05, 2010
Posts: 1005
| Posted: 2010-06-16 16:54
From what i was told cin was old UGTO system linking to lacerta, not R33
_________________
|
Katejina
Grand Admiral
Galactic Navy
Joined: February 13, 2010
Posts: 73
From: katejina
| Posted: 2010-06-16 17:14
Yeah definitely need those no gate systems like we used to have a long time ago since those were very fun
Also need to put a couple of those "secret" planets in the middle of no where back =P
_________________
|
Kangaroosteak
Grand Admiral
Joined: April 03, 2010
Posts: 149
From: Somewhere...
| Posted: 2010-06-16 17:38
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-16 16:06, Lulzypulzy wrote:
sounds good. maybe a system in the middle of the inner ring? would make a interesting "cauldron"
|
|
Yes, a small system in the middle would be a cool thing, maybe a few barren planets and nothing else so that players can't make a fortress.
_________________
The Gaifens call to me!
|
Winters Rapture
Fleet Admiral
United Nations Space Command
Joined: December 09, 2007
Posts: 355
| Posted: 2010-06-16 17:42
Teh Sexyness is this map! Do eet!
_________________
Time for revenge. . .
|
Rebellion
Marshal
Faster than Light
Joined: June 20, 2009
Posts: 730
From: sol
| Posted: 2010-06-16 17:46
if luyten is going to be the icc subsytem can it get a few more planets?
_________________
\"War does not decide who is right, but who is left\"
\"I stopped fighting my inner demons we're on the same side now\"
|
NoBoDx
Grand Admiral
Joined: October 14, 2003
Posts: 784
From: Germany / NRW
| Posted: 2010-06-16 17:49
my 2 cents:
2 rings
an outer, havingt the rich "home systems" plus nearly worthless buffer systems ( maybe one sy planet)
the inner ring have 3 good systems (multiple sy planets) and another small but rich system in the center
this way every faction should be encouraged to fight for this "jewel" in the center
_________________
The only good 'ooman is a dead 'ooman. An' da only fing better than a dead 'ooman'z a dyin' 'ooman who tell you where ter find 'is mates.
|
Starcommander
Marshal
Joined: December 14, 2005
Posts: 579
From: In your base, stealing your cookies
| Posted: 2010-06-16 18:14
I would hope you can keep Cin and R33 the same as they are now, they are wonderful systems to fight in, large with a lot of clusters to fight over (espcially cin so if you are to leave one system unchanged, that would be the one). As for Cins twin terrans, make Little Heaven an ICE or Arid. Cins bigger cluster, the center planet should be the 2nd terran (2 terrans per a "home" system is a good idea)
Eri has no real issues, its a well laid out system, with its two terrans not next to each other. Its clusters are kinda close enough to support one another, maybe make there planets (in each cluster) a little closer so they can support one another better.
Cin should be a Binary star, so should BD, or Eri should lose one star. Its a little unfair that the luth get a binary star system, but the humans get jack.
BD needs a lot of work, all the planets need to be in clusters, with maybe only 1 planet alone by itself. Home systems in general need to be this way for defensive purposes. BD needs its terrans, if all home systems are to be 2 terrans (still is a good idea) then BD's terrans need to be in clusters.
I have a lot of other ideas for this, would love to give the editor a try myself and see if I can use it in the first place.
_________________
WH 40k armies, Grey Knights, Dark Angles, Imperial Guard (Vostroyan First Born) and Orks.
There is a thin line between knowing when to give up and when to try harder.
|
Tellaris
Grand Admiral
Galactic Navy
Joined: April 30, 2002
Posts: 830
From: Land of Chocolate
| Posted: 2010-06-16 18:53
Preferably, the systems BETWEEN the factions, would be unowned by AI. Additionally, with Kaus between UGTO/K'Luth, ICC have a very difficult time getting over there, while the K'Luth have a tough time getting to the Pirates in Luyten. Perhaps having a central "new system" with Kaus and Luyten attached to that would be a better setup. That way every faction has two routes without AI, in which to get to each other and beat each other senseless. In the current setup, each faction only has one such route, except between K'Luth and ICC, who have two ai free routes to each other.
[ This Message was edited by: Tellaris on 2010-06-16 20:21 ]
_________________
Captain of the StarCruiser
I hit planets for fun!
Spellchecker, the POWER t00l
|
Axianda The Royal
Fleet Admiral
Terra Squadron
Joined: November 20, 2001
Posts: 4273
From: Axianda
| Posted: 2010-06-17 01:44
I say put 1 system right in the middle and connect cinn, luyt and the new one to it.
This system is murder to capture alsmost a natural fortress but thats also the one thing that makes it a high priority target.
with this system you get a solid staging ground or fall back position.
_________________
- Axi
|
Reznor
Marshal
Joined: March 29, 2010
Posts: 316
| Posted: 2010-06-17 11:40
I like this map a lot.
The only input I have is: don't make the gates shipyards  .
ICC keeps having luth spawn from our transfer gate and when they go back in, instead of going to cassiopeia, they go back into shipyard, where they pull out a new nest and start the attack new.
We can do the same to them, but it just feels kinda wrong.
_________________
Indictor: 1. To accuse of wrongdoing
Interdictor: (DS) A planetary emplacement or Cruiser Class vessel capable of preventing FTL travel in a certain radius.
|
Lux (Polaris)
Fleet Admiral
Raven Warriors
Joined: April 20, 2004
Posts: 835
From: Asgard
| Posted: 2010-06-17 12:07
Can I have my own system again? "Polaris" orbited by "Kitsune".... 
_________________
ICC Security Councilor - Raven representative
Loyal Admiral of the Interstellar Cultural Confederation Navy.
Senior Commander of the Raven Warriors, the ICC elite.
Captain of the Assault Dreadnaught \"Gungnir\"
|
Rebellion
Marshal
Faster than Light
Joined: June 20, 2009
Posts: 730
From: sol
| Posted: 2010-06-17 12:55
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-17 12:07, Polaris {ISC} wrote:
Can I have my own system again? "Polaris" orbited by "Kitsune"....
|
|
thares a system in Rogens Named after you
_________________
\"War does not decide who is right, but who is left\"
\"I stopped fighting my inner demons we're on the same side now\"
|
Leonide
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights
Joined: October 01, 2005
Posts: 1553
From: Newport News, Virginia
| Posted: 2010-06-17 14:53
make the new systems the Ross 148, 248, and 348 systems. i also suggest Van Maannen for the central new system. one of them at least...
[ This Message was edited by: Leonide *ADM* on 2010-06-17 14:54 ]
_________________
captain of the ICC Assault Cruiser C.S.S. Sledgehammer
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
